SHIPS, PICTURING and PEDAGOGICAL
FANTASY |
Mainly after a speech given at the paper-model conference in the Deutsches Schiffahrtsmuseum at Bremerhaven in april 1998 |
Niews and Views |
|
BILDRUM (home) |
Modelbuilding is a picturing art. Theories on
representation, realism, idealism, seeing and imagination are as valid for
model building as for oil painting, photography or stone carving. I
am afraid that my philosophical knowleges donīt permit me to give a
lecture on post modernism. But I have understood that the copying of
Nature is problematic. Most artists know that copying of Nature is on
principle not possible. But many model builders still do unreflected
attempts to make scaled down copies. All models, like all pieces of art,
are abstractions. My interest in paper modelling has its ground in the
fact that the material in it self stimulates the fantasydemanding art of
making abstractions. |
Let me take some wooden models as examples. The first one is from Vitaby church in southern Sweden. Naive and not very scale true. But during the centuries, I am sure, it has created lots of fantasies in the heads of the parishioners. | The next example is from the church of Fredrikshamn in Denmark. It is very scale true, but something is missing. It canīt be that it is a modern ship. Older ships in churches were all ships of their own times. It should be possible even to-day to represent a modern ship in a church. But this model is just boring. There is no life in it. |
The third example is a kitschy piece of "art". Well handicrafted but more a caricature than a character-representation. The model is "over-defined". The form gives no openings for your own experiences and imaginations. | A different example (by the swedish artist Ture Albert Andersson) is made out of scrap material in a way that really makes the form wide open for personal and unexpected imaginations. |
The Wasa-museum this year showed an exhibition
with some houndred models from the whole world of the Wasa ship. You could
really go round and think much about "true" representations.
Scale true, life true, feel true and what ever true you want. The one true
must not necessarely exclude the other true. Wonderful is when a scale
true model also is life true. But what is then life true? Old ship pictures may be "primitive", but when you study for example old grafitti you can see that very simplified ship representations often have found the most effective way yo characterize the living ship. The rules for picturing and for reading of pictures changes with the times. Therefore we have problems to see from rock carvings what bronze age boats really looked like. You can also realize that grafitti to-day should not represent reality but "cyber-reality". It is a mistake to believe that cyber-reality representations demand more fantasy than reality representations. One houndred years ago there were also rather fixed forms for how to make toys as "fantasyful" representations of real things. Those toys now wake up nostalgic feelings. But of course they did not reflect the imagination resources of the children; more the grewn up peoples predjudices on what sort of fantasy was good for children.
|
This is a 19th century french paper torpedo boat cut-out. The french navy liked odd-looking boats, but this one is far out of reality. Donīt you believe that even children a century ago would have liked a little more scale true representations to help their fantasy? | An other french cut-out from the same time represents a quite realistic scene on the shore. It moves when you pour sand in the right place. The mechanism is very complicated and gives a very modest movement. What here is encourageing your fantasy is not the scene itself. It is the mechanism. Good for children who were to invent the airplane and the modern car. |
Scandinavian children from the first
half of this century have special memories of the weekly magazine Allers
or Familj-journalen. From 1915 it presented one or two cut-outs every week.
It could be a dolls house, a church, an airplane, a fancy scenery. The
best of them were designed by the danish artist H.C.Madsen. Round 1930 he
started to design cut-outs of the most famous houses in the world just to
allow people to build up their own architectural museums. Together with
articles in the magazine this was stimulating the fantasy to think
world-wide. (Or was it just a typical manifestation of western
imperialism?) Madsens designs are not exactly scale true. But they are splendid simplifications that give you living and astonishingly true pictures of the represented houses. So many of the best swedish engineers and artists have told that their creative lives started with the Allers cut-outs. There is a curious gap between the fact that the elite of modernism started to realize themselves with weekly magazines and the elitistic imagination that weekly magazines make people more silly. |
The next step after the cut-outs was to build
models from scrach. Round 1940 the interest in scale-true representations
increased. But it was difficult to get good drawings. You had to make your
own drawings from pictures and from looking at the real thing. And in this
case you were in exactly the same position as an artist looking at a nude
woman to represent in a drawing or a sculpture. You must train your seeing
again and again. And you must train your imagination to find those lines
and volumes that give the best, the most living or the most "true"
representation. For the curious thing about representation is that the
most look-alike representation of nature or a real thing cannot be just a
measured and scaled down or copied one. There must be seeing, imagining,
feeling, trying and seeing again. Even if you just build a model of an
airplane. Plastic modelling has unfortunately given people the chance to get models with the "correct" shape without seeing. It is just to follow the instruction. Then comes the sickness of supering. To many plastic model builders try to build models so that you from a photo canīt see if it is nature or model. But photos are lying. In live, such models mostly look dead. The more exactly scale true you want to build a model, the more of imaginative seeing do you need to make the live model look life-like. I am afraid that also paper modelling with better and better materials could go the same way. You get more and more detailed cut-outs. The model builders just learn to put the parts correctly together. But they never learn to see and imagine. What we have tried in our Model Builders Academy is to open the borderlines of model building and learn from other arts. What can we as model builders learn from a baroque painters way of representing? What can we learn from a romantic sculptor or from a socialy concious documentary photographer? |
Sometimes we like to have our eyes
washed by models that put everything upside down and inside out. Like the
model that the swedish artist Elisabeth Westerlund built from Richard
Vyskovskys cut-out of the Estates Theater in Prague and put under a glass
table.
Gunnar Sillén
|
|